Improving lossless codecs [closed]

Posted by LarsOn on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by LarsOn
Published on 2010-03-30T04:47:50Z Indexed on 2010/03/30 18:23 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 609

  1. Improve the name to match positively Starting just discussing the naming first ignoring tech details, lossless is a negative and double negative word for one good reason should get named more appropriate: Lossless also matches nothing. When naming like all intact or likewise matches something in a manner more physical like sounds are.

  2. Then more technically stated that a copy might contain more information than the original. Does method as such have a name, if so what do I refer to, can we name it if you please or just discuss related handling.

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about lossless

Related posts about lossless-compression